Law firm

Check a contract against your own standard clauses, not against the law in general

A general assistant knows the law; it does not know the firm’s position on liability caps, nor the wording you spent three years negotiating with that particular client. Every associate starts again from their last contract, found from memory.

Create my first project

You describe your work

Nothing to configure. The blueprint derives the agents, their speciality and the folders they need — and submits the lot before writing anything.

Ts-Agents — Blueprint for “Vasseur & Partners”
Your work

"We do commercial law. I want an incoming contract compared against our standard clauses, with every deviation flagged next to the reference clause."

Proposed organisation · nothing written to your drive yet
3 agents proposed
  • Contract analyst/contracts

    Identifies clauses and compares them to the firm’s models

  • Case law watcher/case-law

    Relates a disputed clause to the decisions you rely on

  • Position keeper/positions

    Recalls the firm’s stance on sensitive points

Apply to projectEdit

The workspace takes shape

What you upload and what has to be written together, kept apart. The folders carry the words of your trade — never /documents.

Ts-Agents — Workspace
To upload

The folders are created in your drive. You put your documents in them.

  • /contracts/incoming7 files

    Drafts received, awaiting review

  • /case-law31 files

    The decisions the firm treats as references

  • /modelsempty

    Your standard contracts, the authoritative ones

To write together

These documents do not exist yet. The assistant asks you questions and writes them.

  • /positions/liability.mdwritten

    The firm’s stance on liability caps

  • /positions/data.mdto write

    What you accept and refuse on data processing

Write this document

You ask, the team works

Every step is visible while it runs: the file read, the specialist consulted. The answer cites the paths it relies on.

Ts-Agents — Conversation

Does the SaaS contract we received yesterday deviate from our standard clauses?

The organisation is working — 4 steps
  • read_filereads /contracts/incoming/saas-nexatel.md
  • ask_agentconsults the contract analyst
  • read_filereads /positions/liability.md
  • ask_agentconsults the case law watcher
Three deviations. The heaviest: clause 11.2 caps liability at three months of subscription, where /positions/liability.md sets twelve months as the negotiation floor…

Where the AI stops and asks

These checkpoints are written into workflow.md, in plain text. Between two of them the AI works alone; it does not cross one. You decide where they fall.

  • Before anything is sent to the client: an analysis is not an opinion, and the lawyer signs it.
  • Before adding a decision to the firm’s reference case law.
  • As soon as a deviation touches a point the memory marks as going up to the partner.

The project remembers

Your decisions carry from one conversation to the next — and you can read them, correct them, erase them. A memory you cannot contradict is not one.

Ts-Agents — Project memory
What the project retained4 entries

Re-read on every request. Correct what is wrong, erase what no longer serves.

## Decisions

- Negotiation floor: 12 months of subscription on the liability cap.
- Client Nexatel obtained an exception in 2025 — do not generalise it.
- Any non-solicitation clause beyond 24 months goes up to the partner.

## Preferences

- Quote the reference clause next to every flagged deviation.
SaveForget

Frequently asked questions

Do my clients’ files leave the firm?
They stay in your drive: Ts-Agents reads them there, and our database holds no copy of your documents — only technical indexes. The extracts needed to answer a question go to the model provider you chose, on your own key, so you also choose who sees them.
Does the AI give legal advice?
No, and the workflow forbids it explicitly. The project procedure places a checkpoint before anything is sent to a client: the agent produces a comparative analysis with its sources cited, the lawyer reviews and signs it. An analysis is not an opinion.
How does the firm enforce its positions?
By writing them down, once. The files under /positions are drafted with the assistant from your answers, then re-read by the agents on every request. A corrected position applies to the whole firm immediately, with nothing to reconfigure.

Faithful reconstructions of the interface, built with the product's real components and colours. These are not screen photographs.

Other trades

Describe your work. See what we make of it.

The blueprint shows you the proposed organisation before writing anything to your drive. Judge it on the evidence.

Create my first project